Search  
 

Highlights

(as on September 01, 2008)

TRADE MARKS


The Trade Marks Act, 1999 was brought into force on September 15, 2003. Its salient features are:

A few additional points of note pertaining to Trade Mark Searches, Prosecution, Opposition, Cancellation and Litigation are:

Trade Mark Search

Common law searches are not possible and the Registry has no facility to conduct device mark and proprietor-wise searches. However, Remfry’s with their in-house database and specialized software can carry out device mark and proprietor searches limited to published records. On a standard turnaround basis, at least seven to eight working days are required for providing search results. On an expedited basis, five working days are required.

Prosecution

India being a ‘first to use’ country, date of first use of a mark assumes great significance. Continuous and extensive use of a mark adds to its distinctiveness and helps in overcoming distinctiveness / conflict objections effectively. Given the current trend, one can expect a registration certificate to be issued within two years from the date of filing of application.

Opposition

The time period for filing an opposition is three months from the date of publication of a mark in the Trade Marks Journal. On request, this period can be extended by one month. In the absence of use and prior registration of a trade mark in India, an opposition can be based on prior use and registration of the mark in other countries.

Cancellation

A cancellation action can be filed by person aggrieved by the existence of a trade mark on the Register on either of the following grounds –

  1. If a trade mark is registered without any bona fide intention of use and there has been no bona fide use in relation to the goods or services covered by the mark up to a period of three months before the date of the cancellation action.
  2. If a continuous period of five years or more from the date of registration has elapsed during which there has been no bona fide use of a registered trade mark.
It is not necessary to prove continuous use of a trade mark and even isolated instances of use may   be sufficient to contest the cancellation action provided such use is genuine.

Litigation

In the case of misuse of a trade mark, the law provides for both civil and criminal remedies.

Civil Remedies

Under civil remedies, a suit for infringement can be filed on the basis of statutory rights. In the absence of registration, an action for passing off at common law can be brought against a misuser based upon the reputation and goodwill vesting in the unregistered mark. Transborder or spillover reputation can be relied upon especially if a mark has not been used in India. The period of limitation for filing a suit for infringement / passing off is three years from the date of the impugned act. As passing off is an act of deceit and tort and, every time such act or deceit is committed, a fresh cause of action accrues in favour of the aggrieved . In a significant departure from the old law, a suit for infringement can be instituted even at the place where the plaintiff resides or carries on his business.

Criminal Remedies

Under criminal remedies, a complaint can be filed either with the
(i) Court of a Magistrate against unknown persons with a view to obtain and provide directions to the Police to register a case, investigate and carry out search and seizure operation/s; or
(ii) local Police directly. Upon being satisfied that the named entity is committing any of the offences complained of, the Police may, without the order of the Court, carry out a ‘Search & Seizure’ operation. The local Police may insist on an opinion from the Registrar of Trade Marks (as provided under the Trade Marks Act, 1999) before proceeding in the matter. The proceedings, after the ‘Search and Seizure’ progress to their logical conclusion. Further prosecution entails framing of charges, examination of witnesses and arguments..

PATENTS

Amendments to the Patent Rules by the Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2006 were made effective on May 5, 2006. A brief note on Patent Filing, Prosecution, Opposition, Grant and Litigation in light of the Patent Act and Rules is as follows:

Filing

Prosecution

Opposition

Grant

Litigation

  1. Product inserts
  2. Expert analysis (tests) along with affidavit/s of technical person(s) (Plaintiff’s or third party)
  3. Conduct of Defendant (such as opposing grant of the patent, filing writ against Controller’s decision etc.)

DESIGNS

The Designs Act, 2000 was brought into force on May 11, 2001. Its key features are:

GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

The Geographical Indication of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 was brought into force on September 15, 2003. It provides for, inter alia:

PLANT VARIETIES AND FARMERS’ RIGHTS

The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001 was launched on February 20, 2007 and came into force with effect from October 19, 2006. It provides for, inter alia,

SEMICONDUCTOR IC LAYOUT-DESIGN

A new Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act was enacted in 2000 but is still awaiting notification of the date of enforcement. It provides for, inter alia:

DOMAIN NAMES

A new Domain Name Policy was introduced in India on January 1, 2005. It provides for, inter alia:

    Note: The .IN Registry is confronted with the registration of a large number of undesirable/immoral domain names. Numerous complaints are being filed with the National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI) seeking cancellation/transfer of such Domain Names through Arbitration. As per INDRP Rules of Procedure, the Arbitrator is bound to pronounce the Arbitral Award within 60 calendar days of commencement of the Arbitration Proceedings.